IT Modernization

Avalon doesn't propose to swallow it whole. We size increments to what we can staff with senior people, deliver working capability every 8–12 weeks, and you own the roadmap and the code regardless. If the program outgrows us, the roadmap makes any follow-on vendor's job cheaper, and for genuinely enterprise-scale execution we team and say so up front.

For this specific service, that's accurate today, and Avalon won't dress it up. FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv) requires that an offeror without a record of relevant past performance be rated neutrally, not unfavorably, on that factor. A fixed-price assessment under the Simplified Acquisition Threshold is a low-risk way to build the record together.

They do, and the incumbent's economics reward keeping that system running. An independent disposition analysis costs a fraction of one year of the O&M line and gives you leverage either way: it validates the incumbent's plan or exposes what it protects. Our strangler-pattern approach also doesn't require discarding incumbent knowledge, we document it as we intercept it.

You're already spending the modernization budget, on O&M. The assessment is priced under the simplified acquisition threshold so it can be bought with year-end funds, and its deliverables include the funding strategy: working capital fund options, TMF proposal support, and a decommission-savings case your CFO can take to the budget process.

Unmanaged, it can. That's why authorization-impact analysis precedes every increment, boundary changes are documented as we build, and Avalon's catalog includes the SSP, POA&M, and ATO-facilitation work to keep your assessors ahead of the change rather than behind it. Your Authorizing Official stays in control throughout.

No. Rehosting is one disposition among seven in the TIME/6R framework. Moving a broken system to the cloud produces an expensive broken system, the disposition analysis decides what actually fits each system, not a default answer.

No, and anyone who does before seeing your estate is selling, not assessing. Savings are verified after decommissioning against a documented baseline, not promised up front, that's what makes the decommission report defensible to your CFO and to oversight.