AUTHORIZATION & ACCREDITATION
AUTHORIZATION & ACCREDITATION
Avalon builds and shepherds our security authorization package so the system gets in front of the authorizing official months sooner, with documentation an assessor can actually verify.
Avalon acts as your dedicated authorization team, carrying a federal system through every RMF step from categorization to the AO's decision, so a finished capability doesn't sit blocked behind a package no one had time to write.
THE PROBLEM & THE APPROACH
The Challenge
Our Approach
FISMA requires authorization before operation, so a system running without a current ATO becomes an IG and GAO finding, drags down the agency's FISMA metrics, and exposes the CISO and AO personally to audit scrutiny.
Avalon builds the complete RMF package, Prepare through Monitor, as the system owner's dedicated authorization team, so the requirement gets met on a defensible timeline instead of becoming a standing liability.
New capabilities sit finished but undeployed because no one on staff can produce the package, and expiring ATOs force extension memos or shutdown decisions on systems the mission depends on.
Avalon functions as the analysts who write, the coordinators who chase evidence, and the guides who know what the AO's office and the assessors will ask for before they ask it.
Stale or fictional documentation hides real weaknesses, a package written to pass rather than to describe reality means the agency doesn't actually know its own risk posture.
Avalon's differentiating method is evidence-first documentation: no implementation statement ships unless it's traceable to a named artifact, configuration export, or interview record.
A program blocked at the authorization gate keeps burning O&M dollars, contractor labor, and license fees while delivering zero mission value, six months of delay routinely costs more than the entire facilitation engagement.
Avalon's readiness review is a low-cost, fast wedge that tells a system owner exactly how far the package is from done, before committing to the full engagement.
CORE CAPABILITIES
Stakeholder mapping, gap review, and the categorization and control-baseline decisions every package rests on.
Evidence-traceable control statements and hands-on preparation for the independent assessment.
The package and the briefing that get an AO to a defensible decision, plus the handoff to sustain it.
OUR PROCESS
Stakeholder map, document collection, gap review against the agency's authorization checklist, and an engagement plan tied to the AO office's intake process. (2–3 weeks)
FIPS 199 categorization, authorization boundary definition, network/data-flow diagrams, and privacy threshold analysis. (2–4 weeks)
Baseline selection, tailoring rationale, and common/inherited control mapping. (2–3 weeks)
SSP authoring, the supporting plan set, and evidence library assembly, the long pole of the engagement. (8–16 weeks)
Mock assessment against NIST SP 800-53A procedures, gap burn-down, and evidence remediation. (2–4 weeks)
Security Assessment Plan review, live liaison, war-room support, and findings clarification. (3–6 weeks, schedule is assessor/agency-controlled)
POA&M development, residual-risk narrative, package assembly, and AO briefing. (2–4 weeks)
Continuous monitoring strategy, control assessment calendar, and handoff to the agency ISSO. (1–2 weeks)
WHY AVALON
6
Federal Frameworks Addressed
Founder-Level Delivery, Not Bench Overflow
On a large-integrator engagement, a junior team does the work behind a senior proposal lead. At Avalon, the person who scoped the package is the person interviewing your engineers and defending the narrative at outbrief.
Weeks from award to kickoff, not the quarter-plus a large integrator often needs to staff.
The senior people the buyer met do the interviews, write the narratives, and stand behind the package, not a rotating bench.
Blended rates typically 25–40% below Tier-1 systems integrator rates, with no overhead pyramid to feed.
The team that starts the package is the team that finishes it, no rotation risk on a multi-month authorization.
FREQUENTLY ASKED
Straight answers about what facilitation gets you, what it doesn't, and how the timeline actually works.
Talk to Our Team →6
Federal Frameworks Addressed
No vendor can, and we say so plainly. The authorization decision belongs solely to your Authorizing Official, and the independent assessment belongs to your Security Control Assessor or a 3PAO. Avalon prepares the basis for that decision, a complete, evidence-traceable package, so the AO can act on it quickly.
Fair question, and here's how the risk is managed: named key personnel with verifiable individual A&A track records, full methodology transparency including sanitized sample artifacts before award, and milestone-based fixed pricing with written acceptance criteria so the government holds performance leverage at every stage.
This isn't proposed as displacement. It's surge capacity for a stalled package or a backlog the incumbent's task order was never scoped to clear, plus independent fresh eyes on documentation the incumbent wrote, which AOs increasingly want anyway. The incumbent keeps steady-state continuous monitoring.
For one engagement at a time, yes, with named individuals committed in the proposal. Avalon will also say no to a second simultaneous package rather than slip the first, stated capacity discipline, not overbooked bravado.
Sometimes that's true. The test is arithmetic: an ISSO carrying twenty collateral duties produces a Moderate package in twelve-plus months, if at all. The mission cost of that delay usually exceeds the engagement price several times over, which is exactly what a low-cost readiness review can help you see.
5–9 months for an initial Moderate-baseline authorization with cooperative stakeholders; 3–5 months for a reauthorization with a serviceable existing package. Add 30–50% for High-baseline, classified-adjacent, or heavily STIG-scoped DoD environments. The AO's decision timeline and the assessor's schedule are government-controlled and sit outside any vendor's commitment.
The authorization decision itself, the independent assessment where assessor independence is required, penetration testing, hands-on remediation engineering beyond minor fixes, and FedRAMP 3PAO assessment services. Each of those is a separate government function or a separately scoped Avalon service.
Talk to Avalon about scoping an ATO facilitation engagement, or start with a low-cost readiness review.