ASSESSMENT & PENETRATION TESTING
ASSESSMENT & PENETRATION TESTING
Avalon safely attacks our network the way a real adversary would, proves which weaknesses are genuinely exploitable, and hands us a prioritized, evidence-backed fix list our assessors and our AO will accept.
Avalon's testers act like real attackers, first from the internet, then from inside your network as though a foothold has already been gained, to find and safely prove which weaknesses could actually be used to reach your data or systems.
THE PROBLEM & THE APPROACH
The Challenge
Our Approach
Most assessment work is documentation review, interviews, and configuration checks, it confirms controls are written down and switched on, not that they hold up under attack.
Avalon's testers attempt to break into your network the way a hostile actor would, under a signed agreement, so you learn where you're genuinely exposed before an adversary does.
A flat, over-trusted internal network means a single compromise could take down or expose mission systems, the 'hard shell, soft center' architecture Zero Trust is meant to fix.
Internal testing measures how far an attacker who gains a foothold could move, what they could reach, and whether your defenses would even notice.
CA-8 and the RMF/FISMA assessment cycle expect exploitation-based testing for higher-impact systems, a missing or weak pen test surfaces as an audit finding.
Avalon's methodology follows NIST SP 800-115, PTES, and MITRE ATT&CK, producing control-mapped, assessment-ready evidence for CA-8, RA-5, and your RMF package.
Agencies frequently don't know which of the hundreds of scanner findings actually matter, so remediation spend goes to the loudest finding instead of the reachable one.
Post-exploitation and business-impact mapping turn technical findings into a remediation-priority matrix ranked by exploitability times mission impact.
CORE CAPABILITIES
Reconnaissance and controlled exploitation of internet-facing assets, websites, VPN gateways, mail servers, remote-access portals, and public IP ranges.
Foothold-based testing that measures how far an attacker could move once inside, privilege escalation, lateral movement, and access to sensitive data.
Findings mapped to CA-8, RA-5, and the controls your assessment or POA&M needs to reference.
OUR PROCESS
Define targets, IP ranges, in-scope segments, testing windows, and hands-off systems; execute the Rules of Engagement and any required authorization letters. (1–2 weeks, often gated by agency legal/security sign-off)
Confirm access, network drops, VPN, jump box, credentials for authenticated testing, and finalize points of contact and de-confliction. (2–4 days)
Recon, enumeration, validation, and controlled exploitation of internet-facing assets. (3–7 business days)
Foothold-based enumeration, exploitation, lateral movement, privilege escalation, and access-to-data proof. (5–10 business days)
Risk rating, control mapping, and a draft report. (5–7 business days)
Executive and technical read-outs and delivery of the final report. (2–3 days)
Re-verify remediated findings after you complete fixes. (2–5 business days)
WHY AVALON
5
Federal Frameworks Addressed
Senior Testers Do the Work
At large integrators, the named experts win the work and juniors deliver it. At Avalon, founder-level and senior technical attention is on the engagement directly.
Founder-level and senior technical attention on the engagement, not a big-firm bench.
Faster scoping, testing, and reporting, with a single accountable point of contact and no layered subcontracting.
Rates undercut Big-4 and large-integrator pricing, which commonly runs 2 to 3 times boutique rates for the same test, while delivering equivalent or better hands-on rigor.
Avalon can carry a finding through to remediation, policy, IAM, and Zero Trust work, so you're not left holding a report with no path to fix it.
FREQUENTLY ASKED
Straight answers about scope, boundaries, and what this service will, and won't, get you.
Talk to Our Team →5
Federal Frameworks Addressed
No. A scan produces potential findings; this service safely proves which of them a real attacker could exploit, from outside your network and, where scoped, from inside it too.
External testing works from the public internet against your internet-facing systems. Internal testing assumes an attacker already has a foothold and measures how far they could move, what they could reach, and whether your internal defenses would notice.
No, and that boundary matters enough to state directly. This engagement addresses NIST 800-53 CA-8 and produces control-mapped evidence to support your RMF Assess step and annual FISMA assessment. It doesn't achieve the ATO, and for a FedRAMP authorization test specifically, that role belongs to an accredited 3PAO.
Not directly, CMMC and NIST 800-171 have no explicit penetration-testing line item. A network pen test is a strong supporting best practice that de-risks a CMMC assessment, but we won't sell it to you as a box you must check for certification.
Active testing typically runs 2–4 weeks; total calendar time from signed ROE to final report usually runs 6–10 weeks, with most of the variance on the agency side (scoping and authorization sign-off).
For a single engagement of this size, yes. We'll walk you through the staffing plan and timeline up front, We won't over-promise capacity we don't have, and we're glad to start with a bounded, external-only scope so you can judge our rigor at low risk.
A designated point of contact, a signed ROE and authorization letter, access provisioning (network drop, VPN, or jump box, plus any test credentials), a defined testing window, and an emergency-stop procedure. Late access provisioning is the single most common cause of schedule slippage, and it's tracked in writing from kickoff.
Talk to Avalon about scoping an external and internal network penetration test.