Mobile Development

That's accurate at the corporate level, and Avalon won't pretend otherwise. Our named key personnel carry documented mobile delivery records, the fixed-price milestone structure puts delivery risk on us, and we start with a discovery sprint small enough to judge us on evidence within a month.

Everything lives in your tenancy from day one, code in your repository, designs in transferable files, the pipeline documented. We pair engineers so no component has a single owner, and the transition runbook is a deliverable, not an afterthought.

OMB is often right, and M-23-22 requires the justification, so we make it the first deliverable. If discovery shows responsive web meets the need, we say so and re-scope; you'll have the decision memo either way.

It takes forever when the vendor shows up at the end with a binary and no evidence. We engage your ISSO in Phase 1, build to MASVS, and deliver the vetting package with the release candidate, your reviewers evaluate evidence, they don't excavate it.

The developer accounts are yours, and the app follows platform rules we design to from the start; precedent for agency apps is deep. For workforce apps, managed/MDM distribution avoids public review entirely.

Your team can, code, docs, and pipeline are yours, with no proprietary lock-in. If you'd rather not staff it, sustainment is a priced option, not a hostage situation.

It saves meaningfully, typically 25–40% versus dual native, not 50%, because integration, security, and 508 work don't halve. We default to cross-platform for cost control and go dual-native only where performance or hardware access genuinely requires it.